H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 0-1

Lilia Osterloh holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 San Diego second round 3-6 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R64 Hard Lilia Osterloh #53 3-6 6-2 6-0 Virginie Razzano #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —