H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Roland Garros third round 7-5 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #1 7-5 4-6 6-4 Virginie Razzano #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —