H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Virginie Razzano vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-3
Lisa Raymond holds a 3–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2006 Los Angeles second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-2 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 6-0 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2003* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Virginie Razzano | 6-2 7-6(7) | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2001* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-1 6-2 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginie Razzano | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |