H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 2-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2013 Seoul third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2013* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #93 6-1 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #60 Match data
Oct 11, 2007* Bangkok WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #27 6-0 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2