H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Lubomira Bacheva H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Lubomira Bacheva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 5-7 7-6(4) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lubomira Bacheva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #351 5-7 7-6(4) 6-0 Lubomira Bacheva #79 Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Lubomira Bacheva #100 6-3 6-4 Virginie Razzano #383 Match data May 26, 1999* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lubomira Bacheva #1,157 #68 445 1,523 27 56 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Lubomira Bacheva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #289 1,492 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #185 1,488 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #251 1,462 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #280 1,452 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 1999 7–10 41.2% #73 1,493 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2000 7–15 31.8% #96 1,474 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2001 6–14 30.0% #113 1,455 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2002 5–7 41.7% #158 1,482 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #150 1,470 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2004 0–1 0.0% #224 1,468 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Lubomira Bacheva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 3 11 14 21.4% 22 34 56 39.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 1/1 of Lubomira Bacheva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Lubomira Bacheva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2004 1/1 0.0 2.0 71.2% 50.0% 35.3% 28.6% 66.7% 45.8% 35.0%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 1/83 0.0 2.0 71.2% 50.0% 35.3% 28.6% 66.7% 45.8% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Lubomira Bacheva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 1991 1492 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.12
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 1992 1489 110.8 — — — — — +81 — 38.5% -0.39 0–1 — — +0.42
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1993 1463 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.08
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1994 1453 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 1999 1493 110.9 — — — — +16 +47 — 40.5% -0.49 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.34
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2000 1474 102.9 — — — — -12 +51 +47 40.0% -0.88 0–6 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 97.0 +1.59
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2001 1455 103.2 — — — — -19 +45 — 31.8% -0.86 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.9 +0.85
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2002 1482 106.4 — — — — — +28 — 42.3% -0.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2003 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — 0.00
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2004 1469 103.0 +0.39 +3.11 0.645 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.20
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1524 107.5 +0.39 +3.11 0.645 40.3% -9 +45 +47 36.4% -0.82 5–13 (28%) 9–10 (47%) 95.2 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.