H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 0-2

Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 2–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2005 Rome second round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Maria Vento-Kabchi #53 6-4 7-6(4) Virginie Razzano #35 Match data
Jun 13, 2003* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Maria Vento-Kabchi #137 6-3 6-3 Virginie Razzano #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,716 95 156 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Maria Vento-Kabchi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,629 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,653 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,535 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,537 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,534 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,512 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,714 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2004 18–26 40.9% #48 1,628 0 0
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,573 0 0
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,461 0 0
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —