H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-2

Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2003 San Diego second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R64 Hard Mary Pierce #73 6-1 6-3 Virginie Razzano #55 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mary Pierce #7 6-4 6-0 Virginie Razzano #351 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —