H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Meghann Shaughnessy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2007 Charleston second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2007* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginie Razzano #64 6-3 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #52 Match data
Jan 9, 2003* Canberra WTA 250 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #28 6-3 6-2 Virginie Razzano #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —