H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Nathalie Dechy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2003 Scottsdale fourth round 6-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2003* Scottsdale WTA 500 R16 Hard Nathalie Dechy #19 6-4 (ret.) Virginie Razzano #60 Match data
Apr 4, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Virginie Razzano #98 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —