H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 2-4

Patty Schnyder holds a 4–2 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2010 Montreal second round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Patty Schnyder #52 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Virginie Razzano #114 Match data
Feb 11, 2010* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Patty Schnyder #44 6-3 7-6(3) Virginie Razzano #24 Match data
Aug 27, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #17 6-3 3-6 6-3 Patty Schnyder #20 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Virginie Razzano #56 6-3 6-1 Patty Schnyder #15 Match data
Jan 5, 2006* Gold Coast WTA 500 R32 Hard Patty Schnyder #7 6-3 7-6(2) Virginie Razzano #51 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Gold Coast WTA 500 R32 Hard Patty Schnyder #14 6-2 6-4 Virginie Razzano #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11