H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Rita Grande H2H: 0-2

Rita Grande holds a 2–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2004 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #87 6-1 6-2 Virginie Razzano #103 Match data Aug 19, 2004* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rita Grande #103 6-4 4-6 6-3 Virginie Razzano #118 Match data Jun 27, 2004* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Grande
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Grande
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 11/69 of Rita Grande's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Grande
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% 2003 5/39 1.8 2.0 66.2% 63.8% 43.9% 57.0% 58.1% 57.7% 47.6%
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2004 6/30 1.5 1.2 71.4% 59.5% 42.2% 52.1% 31.0% 54.8% 41.4%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 11/393 1.6 1.5 69.0% 61.5% 43.0% 54.3% 43.3% 56.1% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Grande
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.