H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Rita Kuti-Kis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2003 Budapest round of 32 1-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rita Kuti-Kis
HUN Age 48 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #55 1-6 6-2 6-1 Rita Kuti-Kis #174 Match data Apr 17, 2003* R32 Budapest Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Rita Kuti-Kis #57 6-2 4-6 6-3 Virginie Razzano #115 Match data May 3, 2001* R32 Bol Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano — #16 2,420 1,855 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rita Kuti-Kis — #47 660 1,699 58 69 45.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Kuti-Kis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1996 3–2 60.0% #183 1,527 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #277 1,516 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,537 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1999 13–15 46.4% #87 1,559 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 2000 20–18 52.6% #56 1,569 0 1
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 2001 16–19 45.7% #78 1,579 0 1
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2002 4–9 30.8% #171 1,509 0 1
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,635 0 2 2003 0–3 0.0% #174 1,475 0 1
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 5 24 29 17.2% 53 40 93 57.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1996 1528 104.4 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–0 0–1 — +0.35
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1997 1516 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 1998 1538 112.0 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% -0.38 — — — -0.05
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -34 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1999 1559 114.8 — — — — -57 +78 — 48.4% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 +0.64
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 2000 1570 124.0 — — — — -103 +167 — 52.8% +0.40 6–7 (46%) 6–8 (43%) 97.7 +1.78
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2001 1580 118.9 — — — — -155 +163 — 46.3% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.86
24 2007 1807 138.9 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +50 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.88 2002 1510 100.6 — — — — -116 +129 — 35.5% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 +0.80
25 2008 1635 123.9 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +53 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.95 2003 1476 101.1 — — — — — +99 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.09
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -108 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1656 120.0 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -5 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1681 124.1 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% 0 -64 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +12 +13 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1683 127.2 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -8 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.9 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -16 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 108.2 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.2 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -6 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.23 — 1699 119.1 — — — — -118 +131 — 47.0% -0.21 19–23 (45%) 13–20 (39%) 93.8 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.