H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-2

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2005 Eastbourne third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.

FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Virginie Razzano #35 6-3 4-6 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #24 Match data
Apr 9, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Silvia Farina Elia #24 6-1 6-3 Virginie Razzano #54 Match data
Feb 11, 2005* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #19 6-4 6-1 Virginie Razzano #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Silvia Farina Elia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3