H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2009 Madrid second round 6-0 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginie Razzano #34 6-0 4-6 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #48 Match data
Oct 4, 2007* Japan Open WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #33 6-3 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4