H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginie Razzano vs Vania King H2H: 2-0
Virginie Razzano holds a 2–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2016 Prague third round 6-1 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2016* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginie Razzano | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Vania King | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2007* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Virginie Razzano | 6-3 6-4 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginie Razzano | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |