H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 3-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 3–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2007 Guangzhou quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2007* Guangzhou WTA 500 QF Hard Virginie Razzano #39 6-3 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #82 Match data
Aug 15, 2005 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Virginie Razzano #39 6-3 3-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #113 Match data
Apr 5, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginie Razzano #98 6-3 5-7 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3