H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Yuliana Fedak H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Yuliana Fedak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay, while Yuliana Fedak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2008 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Yuliana Fedak
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #27 6-2 6-1 Yuliana Fedak #107 Match data Apr 9, 2008* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Yuliana Fedak #86 6-3 6-0 Virginie Razzano #55 Match data Mar 8, 2005* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yuliana Fedak #904 #63 498 1,583 27 68 28.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Yuliana Fedak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #195 1,472 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 2003 3–2 60.0% #209 1,498 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 2004 4–6 40.0% #82 1,526 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 2005 5–18 21.7% #114 1,446 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 2006 7–13 35.0% #80 1,458 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2007 6–14 30.0% #123 1,508 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2008 2–9 18.2% #154 1,469 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2009 0–2 0.0% #167 1,448 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2010 0–2 0.0% #256 1,425 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Yuliana Fedak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 9 11 18.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 14 42 56 25.0% 10 21 31 32.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 43/88 of Yuliana Fedak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Yuliana Fedak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% 2004 3/10 0.0 1.7 61.5% 55.5% 57.2% 69.6% 61.1% 56.3% 52.0%
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% 2005 4/23 0.5 3.3 65.7% 54.3% 38.4% 46.2% 26.4% 49.2% 33.8%
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% 2006 7/20 0.6 3.7 66.0% 57.8% 40.1% 56.9% 38.1% 51.7% 41.3%
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% 2007 16/20 1.1 3.3 64.5% 58.6% 39.1% 48.7% 56.1% 52.1% 41.8%
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% 2008 9/11 0.8 5.6 58.7% 59.1% 34.3% 41.9% 59.1% 48.9% 39.4%
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% 2009 2/2 0.0 3.0 61.7% 45.2% 40.2% 36.9% 100.0% 42.6% 37.5%
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% 2010 2/2 1.5 7.5 50.6% 54.2% 34.7% 61.9% 50.0% 43.9% 38.3%
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 43/95 0.8 3.9 62.6% 57.1% 39.3% 49.9% 53.1% 50.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Yuliana Fedak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 2002 1472 96.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 2003 1499 109.4 — — — — — +58 — 66.7% +1.25 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.47
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 2004 1527 118.0 +0.09 +1.80 1.189 54.2% -17 +41 — 45.8% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.03
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 2005 1447 107.0 -1.24 -2.60 0.665 42.3% +19 +63 — 27.5% -1.47 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 -1.34
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2006 1459 110.5 -2.19 -1.85 0.855 47.0% +4 +61 — 34.1% -0.98 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.53
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2007 1508 121.7 -2.13 -0.44 0.873 47.5% -73 +37 +72 33.3% -1.15 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.6 -1.09
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2008 1470 102.7 -3.47 -2.80 0.770 44.2% -28 +5 — 23.1% -1.92 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.50
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2009 1449 97.2 -0.70 -2.67 0.653 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.01
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2010 1426 92.4 -2.45 -0.90 0.683 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.21
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1584 113.9 -2.13 -1.33 0.826 46.1% -15 +46 +72 32.6% -1.18 9–18 (33%) 9–9 (50%) 98.5 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.