H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Marita Redondo H2H: 0-1
Marita Redondo holds a 1–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1973 London Rothmans second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1973* | London Rothmans | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Marita Redondo | 6-3 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |