H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Pam Shriver H2H: 11-10
Wendy Turnbull holds a 11–10 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 21 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 5–3 on carpet, while they are tied 3–3 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1987 Dallas quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
11
–
10
21 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1987* | Dallas | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1985* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-0 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1985* | Newport | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 6-4 7-6 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1984 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1984* | Chicago | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-4 7-6 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1983* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Pam Shriver | 6-4 7-5 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1983* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1982* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1982* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 7-6 7-6 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| May 1, 1982* | Orlando | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Wendy Turnbull | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1982* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1981* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1981 | Landover | WTA 250 | RR | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 7-5 7-5 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1980* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 3-6 6-4 7-6 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Dec 5, 1980* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1980* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1979* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-0 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1979* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 7-5 6-1 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Pam Shriver | #234 | #3 | 163 | 2,302 | 624 | 277 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Pam Shriver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 58–25 | 69.9% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 47–19 | 71.2% | — | 2,087 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 52–15 | 77.6% | — | 2,161 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,060 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,117 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #5 | 2,194 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 20 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 58–14 | 80.6% | #5 | 2,188 | 0 | 24 |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 24 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #66 | 1,911 | 0 | 24 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 24 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,858 | 0 | 24 |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | 1993 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,819 | 0 | 24 |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,699 | 0 | 24 |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,649 | 0 | 24 |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 24 |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #234 | 1,635 | 0 | 24 |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |