H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wendy White vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 3-1
Wendy White holds a 3–1 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wendy White leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wendy White won the 1985 Princeton third round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1985* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy White | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1985* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy White | 6-1 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1983* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy White | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1981* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-4 6-4 | Wendy White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy White | #567 | #28 | 24 | 1,858 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy White | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #45 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |