H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Xiaodi You vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-1
Shuai Peng holds a 1–0 lead over Xiaodi You in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2019 Tianjin third round 6-2 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shuai Peng | 6-2 7-6(1) | Xiaodi You | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaodi You | #186 | #166 | 446 | 1,558 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,890 | 300 | 258 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xiaodi You | Shuai Peng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #406 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #40 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #84 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #125 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |