H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Guangzhou third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2011* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-2 6-1 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Jarmila Wolfe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |