H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Junri Namigata H2H: 2-0
Xinyun Han holds a 2–0 lead over Junri Namigata in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Xinyun Han leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyun Han won the 2018 Nanchang third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 6-4 6-0 | Junri Namigata | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2016* | Jiangxi Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Junri Namigata | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Junri Namigata | #1,159 | #105 | 641 | 1,519 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Junri Namigata | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |