H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Xinyun Han vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 2-0
Xinyun Han holds a 2–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Xinyun Han leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyun Han won the 2016 Australian Open first round 6-2 2-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Xinyun Han | 6-2 2-1 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Xinyun Han | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Xinyun Han | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |