H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 2-1
Yafan Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yafan Wang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2020 Australian Open first round 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2017* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |