H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 0-1
Evgeniya Rodina holds a 1–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2017 Guangzhou fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2017* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-1 6-2 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |