H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Lauren Davis H2H: 2-0
Yafan Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yafan Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2019 Tianjin third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-0 6-4 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 4-6 6-4 4-0 (ret.) | Lauren Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |