H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-2
Lesia Tsurenko holds a 2–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2019 Washington third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2019* | Washington | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 6-2 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-5 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |