H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-1
Yafan Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2018 Bucharest fourth round 7-6(0) 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Yafan Wang | 7-6(0) 3-0 (ret.) | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| May 23, 2018* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Pauline Parmentier | 6-4 7-6(8) | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2018* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |