H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yanina Wickmayer vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 1-1
Yanina Wickmayer and Alisa Kleybanova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2009 Beijing second round 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2009* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Alisa Kleybanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yanina Wickmayer | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |