H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Yanina Wickmayer vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-1
Yanina Wickmayer and Iveta Benesova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay, while Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2012 Rome second round 6-4 5-7 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2008* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yanina Wickmayer | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |