H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yanina Wickmayer vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-2
Justine Henin holds a 2–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 Stuttgart fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2010* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-3 7-5 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yanina Wickmayer | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |