H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Yanina Wickmayer vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 2-1
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 2–1 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yung Jan Chan won the 2012 San Diego third round 7-6(6) 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yung Jan Chan | 7-6(6) 0-0 (ret.) | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2010* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-3 6-1 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2008* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-3 7-6(2) | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yanina Wickmayer | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |