H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yvonne Meusburger vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 0-2
Edina Gallovits Hall holds a 2–0 lead over Yvonne Meusburger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Edina Gallovits Hall leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edina Gallovits Hall won the 2008 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Edina Gallovits Hall | 6-1 6-2 | Yvonne Meusburger | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Edina Gallovits Hall | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Yvonne Meusburger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Meusburger | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |