H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yvonne Meusburger vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-1
Yvonne Meusburger and Iveta Benesova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay, while Yvonne Meusburger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yvonne Meusburger won the 2014 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2014* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yvonne Meusburger | 6-4 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2008* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 6-1 7-5 | Yvonne Meusburger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Meusburger | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |