H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Meusburger vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 1-1
Yvonne Meusburger and Maria Elena Camerin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Meusburger leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-4 6-2 | Yvonne Meusburger | Match data |
| May 20, 2004* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yvonne Meusburger | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Meusburger | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |