H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–1 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1985 Ginny Championships quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1985* | Ginny Championships | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 2-6 7-6 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-3 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yvonne Vermaak | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |