H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 1–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1984 Boston third round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1984* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-6 6-0 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Vermaak | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |