H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Lisa Bonder Kreiss H2H: 0-4
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 4–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1985 Salt Lake City third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1985* | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-0 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1985* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-1 6-0 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| May 8, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-1 2-6 7-6 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yvonne Vermaak | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 |
| 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |