H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Yvonne Vermaak vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1985 Eastbourne Open round of 64 2-6 6-2 6-1.

RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #75 2-6 6-2 6-1 Yvonne Vermaak Match data Jun 19, 1985* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Lori Mcneil #90 6-2 7-5 Yvonne Vermaak Match data Jan 17, 1985* R32 Denver WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yvonne Vermaak — #38 10 1,892 239 250 48.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,606 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,765 0 2 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,794 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1980 19–19 50.0% — 1,735 0 2 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,720 0 2 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,821 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,755 0 4 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1985 8–21 27.6% — 1,605 0 5 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1979 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 9 11 18.2% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1980 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1981 7 9 16 43.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1983 14 4 18 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1984 12 7 19 63.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 64 136 52.9% 78 72 150 52.0% 55 44 99 55.6% 33 69 102 32.4% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1496 101.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.39 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1974 1489 99.2 — — — — +43 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.69 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1975 1599 120.1 — — — — +53 -2 -47 57.1% +0.46 3–6 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +2.23 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1976 1607 119.9 — — — — -10 +39 — 48.8% +0.09 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.77 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1977 1766 138.3 — — — — -80 -80 -75 58.1% +0.41 3–3 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -0.04 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1978 1794 135.9 — — — — +3 -135 -32 52.6% +0.33 8–6 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.36 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1979 1781 155.4 — — — — -43 -75 +23 40.5% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -4.15 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1980 1735 137.1 — — — — -93 +40 +57 51.2% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.6 -4.28 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1981 1720 144.0 — — — — -67 +97 — 43.1% -0.39 4–6 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -2.56 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1982 1821 143.1 — — — — -78 +69 -9 55.2% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 9–10 (47%) 99.9 -2.99 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1983 1755 138.2 — — — — +8 +105 +98 55.4% +0.20 10–11 (48%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 +1.01 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1984 1801 135.0 — — — — -65 -14 +95 53.1% +0.15 5–11 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.0 -0.27 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1985 1605 125.4 — — — — +12 +115 +210 37.7% -0.97 1–10 (9%) 0–1 — -0.88 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1986 1566 105.2 — — — — +20 +85 +195 36.8% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1987 1559 108.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.38 — — — -0.55 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 1988 1542 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1893 142.0 — — — — -34 +34 +34 50.0% -0.06 55–80 (41%) 41–47 (47%) 93.2 -1.90 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.