H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Vermaak vs Molly Van Nostrand H2H: 1-0
Yvonne Vermaak holds a 1–0 lead over Molly Van Nostrand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1984 Brisbane second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 61
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1984* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-3 7-6 | Molly Van Nostrand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Molly Van Nostrand | — | — | — | 1,685 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Vermaak | Molly Van Nostrand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |