H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Yvonne Vermaak vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1987 Charleston Open round of 64 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #94 6-1 7-5 Yvonne Vermaak #84 Match data Apr 8, 1987* R64 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #58 2-6 7-5 7-5 Yvonne Vermaak Match data Apr 17, 1985* R64 Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yvonne Vermaak — #38 10 1,892 239 250 48.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Sandra Cecchini — #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,606 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,765 0 2 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,747 0 2
21 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,794 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1980 19–19 50.0% — 1,735 0 2 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,720 0 2 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,821 0 2 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,755 0 4 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1985 8–21 27.6% — 1,605 0 5 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,841 0 11
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1979 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 9 11 18.2% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1980 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1981 7 9 16 43.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1983 14 4 18 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 12 7 19 63.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 64 136 52.9% 78 72 150 52.0% 55 44 99 55.6% 33 69 102 32.4% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yvonne Vermaak Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1496 101.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.39 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
17 1974 1489 99.2 — — — — +43 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.69 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.59
18 1975 1599 120.1 — — — — +53 -2 -47 57.1% +0.46 3–6 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +2.23 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.14
19 1976 1607 119.9 — — — — -10 +39 — 48.8% +0.09 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.77 1984 1652 123.4 — — — — +48 -80 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +1.93
20 1977 1766 138.3 — — — — -80 -80 -75 58.1% +0.41 3–3 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -0.04 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -81 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.73
21 1978 1794 135.9 — — — — +3 -135 -32 52.6% +0.33 8–6 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.36 1986 1633 120.1 — — — — -64 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.35
22 1979 1781 155.4 — — — — -43 -75 +23 40.5% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -4.15 1987 1860 148.2 — — — — -142 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +1.29
23 1980 1735 137.1 — — — — -93 +40 +57 51.2% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.6 -4.28 1988 1844 145.8 — — — — -150 +156 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.39
24 1981 1720 144.0 — — — — -67 +97 — 43.1% -0.39 4–6 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -2.56 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -133 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.83
25 1982 1821 143.1 — — — — -78 +69 -9 55.2% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 9–10 (47%) 99.9 -2.99 1990 1815 140.6 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1983 1755 138.2 — — — — +8 +105 +98 55.4% +0.20 10–11 (48%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 +1.01 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -137 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1984 1801 135.0 — — — — -65 -14 +95 53.1% +0.15 5–11 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.0 -0.27 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1985 1605 125.4 — — — — +12 +115 +210 37.7% -0.97 1–10 (9%) 0–1 — -0.88 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +132 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1986 1566 105.2 — — — — +20 +85 +195 36.8% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 1987 1559 108.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.38 — — — -0.55 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 1988 1542 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +16 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1893 142.0 — — — — -34 +34 +34 50.0% -0.06 55–80 (41%) 41–47 (47%) 93.2 -1.90 — 1937 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +3.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.