H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 0-1

Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2019 Australian Open first round 3-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aleksandra Krunic #61 3-6 7-5 6-1 Zarina Diyas #95 Match data Jan 16, 2019* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zarina Diyas Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — —
25 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
Career — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zarina Diyas Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1% 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8% 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8% 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1% 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1% 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8% 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1% 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
30 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
32 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zarina Diyas Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.