H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Zarina Diyas vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 3-0
Zarina Diyas holds a 3–0 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zarina Diyas leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2018 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2018* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Zarina Diyas | 6-3 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Zarina Diyas | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zarina Diyas | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |