H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Zarina Diyas vs Klara Koukalova H2H: 2-0
Zarina Diyas holds a 2–0 lead over Klara Koukalova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zarina Diyas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2014 Beijing second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2014* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-1 6-4 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2014* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-2 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Klara Koukalova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 |