Zarina Diyas
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2015 Charleston Open first round 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Zarina Diyas | Match data | Apr 8, 2015* | R64 | Charleston Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,756 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,725 | 92 | 121 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #77 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #166 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2010 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2020 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2012 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 85 | 153 | 44.4% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | — | 42 | 70 | 112 | 37.5% | 49 | 43 | 92 | 53.3% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2/3 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 53.3% | 69.6% | 41.1% | 60.7% | 64.6% | 56.3% | 58.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 57.9% | 62.6% | 42.3% | 41.2% | 52.3% | 53.9% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 61.8% | 61.5% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 59.0% | 54.1% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 42.5% | 60.7% | 29.5% | 23.6% | 45.0% | 41.7% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 67.7% | 55.4% | 61.1% | 72.7% | 64.6% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 32/34 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 68.2% | 58.4% | 47.3% | 49.4% | 51.1% | 55.1% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 41/47 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 71.2% | 57.9% | 47.0% | 48.3% | 51.6% | 54.7% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 20/20 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 60.5% | 41.6% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 54.9% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 11/11 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 68.1% | 64.5% | 46.2% | 53.5% | 57.0% | 58.7% | 45.1% | 2008 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 51.8% | 71.1% | 42.3% | 56.1% | 51.6% | 57.2% | 44.6% |
| 24 | 2018 | 32/32 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.4% | 48.3% | 52.6% | 44.3% | 56.7% | 42.8% | 2009 | 24/25 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 53.4% | 71.1% | 49.0% | 48.0% | 44.0% | 60.8% | 42.9% |
| 25 | 2019 | 20/20 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 59.4% | 44.8% | 45.3% | 36.7% | 55.0% | 42.1% | 2010 | 22/22 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 50.2% | 68.4% | 45.5% | 49.2% | 38.3% | 56.1% | 38.8% |
| 26 | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 74.3% | 57.0% | 47.6% | 53.8% | 48.6% | 54.4% | 44.2% | 2011 | 35/36 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 52.3% | 71.6% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 47.7% | 58.6% | 41.1% |
| 27 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 60.0% | 42.6% | 48.1% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 41.3% | 2012 | 35/35 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 53.4% | 73.2% | 46.3% | 54.8% | 44.6% | 60.8% | 38.8% |
| 28 | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 70.2% | 56.2% | 67.7% | 66.7% | 20.0% | 59.6% | 33.6% | 2013 | 10/16 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 55.8% | 65.2% | 37.7% | 52.7% | 36.8% | 52.7% | 35.5% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6/6 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 52.3% | 77.4% | 42.9% | 66.9% | 37.6% | 61.1% | 41.0% |
| 30 | 2024 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 70.9% | 46.7% | 31.4% | 45.5% | 38.8% | 42.6% | 40.0% | 2015 | 29/34 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 56.8% | 71.5% | 49.2% | 49.7% | 47.5% | 61.6% | 39.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 49.6% | 69.1% | 44.0% | 48.8% | 38.7% | 56.2% | 39.4% |
| 32 | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 61.0% | 31.6% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 51.7% | 36.4% | 2017 | 7/7 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 53.8% | 73.2% | 46.9% | 48.6% | 38.1% | 61.0% | 39.3% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 54.2% | 79.5% | 36.4% | 57.1% | 40.0% | 59.7% | 33.3% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 55.6% | 60.0% | 55.6% | 61.1% | 53.3% |
| Career | — | 217/227 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 45.4% | 49.3% | 48.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% | — | 193/213 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 53.1% | 71.1% | 45.8% | 52.2% | 43.6% | 59.1% | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Zarina Diyas | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1528 | 105.5 | +0.98 | +1.13 | 1.348 | 57.6% | — | +48 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2010 | 1539 | 114.4 | +0.14 | -1.62 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +19 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.8 | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2011 | 1505 | 103.6 | -1.72 | -1.18 | 0.875 | 47.5% | +17 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1477 | 95.3 | -2.37 | -3.62 | 0.739 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1478 | 100.3 | -1.99 | -0.40 | 1.012 | 50.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.60 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1683 | 130.0 | -0.83 | +1.87 | 1.021 | 50.5% | -29 | -121 | -28 | 57.5% | +0.52 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.0 | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 1561 | 125.0 | -2.62 | +2.02 | 0.975 | 49.5% | -15 | -26 | +133 | 47.0% | -0.32 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 91.8 | +1.00 | 2006 | 1491 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1553 | 119.4 | -0.44 | +0.63 | 0.974 | 49.5% | +1 | -18 | — | 42.6% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.38 | 2007 | 1476 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1665 | 121.5 | +1.12 | +0.16 | 1.091 | 52.1% | +6 | — | +15 | 57.7% | +0.73 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.1 | +0.69 | 2008 | 1522 | 116.1 | +0.28 | -0.38 | 1.043 | 51.8% | — | +57 | — | 60.0% | +1.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1718 | 138.2 | -0.01 | -0.24 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +12 | -125 | — | 44.9% | -0.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -2.35 | 2009 | 1600 | 113.4 | +2.94 | -1.31 | 1.096 | 52.0% | -63 | +42 | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.1 | +1.41 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1704 | 128.4 | -1.13 | -1.09 | 0.937 | 48.5% | +30 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.58 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 2010 | 1499 | 111.9 | -0.60 | -4.41 | 0.885 | 47.5% | -50 | +122 | — | 31.9% | -0.96 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.3 | -0.10 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1660 | 115.9 | -0.51 | +0.34 | 0.969 | 49.6% | +68 | -136 | — | 44.8% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.0 | -0.43 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.7 | +2.75 | -1.69 | 0.993 | 49.9% | -48 | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.0 | -0.58 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1688 | 125.7 | -1.93 | -1.44 | 0.902 | 47.7% | +47 | -117 | -89 | 43.8% | -0.62 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | -1.46 | 2012 | 1653 | 123.3 | +3.46 | -3.66 | 0.991 | 49.7% | -39 | +6 | — | 51.3% | -0.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.15 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1681 | 107.4 | -0.79 | +5.23 | 0.833 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.23 | 2013 | 1562 | 108.1 | -2.03 | -4.06 | 0.752 | 44.2% | -32 | +96 | — | 36.1% | -0.94 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.1 | +0.39 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1587 | 119.5 | +2.19 | +0.06 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -26 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.33 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1631 | 100.1 | -0.16 | -2.90 | 0.697 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2015 | 1642 | 127.6 | +3.16 | -1.64 | 1.028 | 50.2% | -66 | +87 | -139 | 46.3% | -0.26 | 9–3 (75%) | 2–4 (33%) | 105.6 | -2.33 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1549 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1580 | 113.8 | -0.39 | -1.79 | 0.900 | 47.8% | -16 | +88 | — | 32.5% | -0.90 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -0.40 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1546 | 107.0 | -0.57 | -1.69 | 0.752 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 | 2017 | 1620 | 113.7 | +2.37 | -0.32 | 1.008 | 50.4% | -16 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.49 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1616 | 101.7 | +2.29 | +2.10 | 0.828 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1597 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1550 | 93.8 | +0.91 | +0.06 | 1.371 | 57.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| Career | — | 1756 | 131.4 | -1.07 | +0.30 | 0.966 | 49.3% | +8 | -81 | +46 | 46.2% | -0.25 | 32–36 (47%) | 22–29 (43%) | 97.4 | -0.47 | — | 1726 | 122.6 | +1.93 | -2.27 | 0.977 | 49.5% | -43 | +67 | -139 | 45.1% | -0.27 | 27–36 (43%) | 26–33 (44%) | 99.1 | -1.07 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |