H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Zarina Diyas vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-2

Monica Puig holds a 2–1 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2019 Pan Pacific Open first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zarina Diyas #85 6-0 6-3 Monica Puig #69 Match data Sep 19, 2019* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Puig #65 6-4 2-6 6-2 Zarina Diyas #54 Match data May 7, 2018 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Monica Puig #106 6-4 (ret.) Zarina Diyas #45 Match data Oct 5, 2015 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zarina Diyas Monica Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
19 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0
20 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1
21 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1
22 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2
23 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2
24 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2
25 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2
26 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2
27 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2
30 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zarina Diyas Monica Puig
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7%
23 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Zarina Diyas Monica Puig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1% 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8%
18 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1% 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0%
19 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8% 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0%
20 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8% 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7%
21 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1% 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4%
22 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9% 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7%
23 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1% 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8%
24 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8% 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1%
25 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1% 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1%
26 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2% 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8%
27 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6% 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7%
30 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4% — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zarina Diyas Monica Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
18 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
19 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09
20 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29
21 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38
22 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14
23 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88
24 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76
25 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89
26 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
27 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
30 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47 — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.