Zi Yan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 17, 2007 | H2H |
| Vera Dushevina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 27, 2008 | H2H |
| Agnes Szavay | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 14, 2008 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Zi Yan vs Sanda Mamic H2H: 0-1
Sanda Mamic holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sanda Mamic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sanda Mamic won the 2005 Modena round of 16 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanda Mamic | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Zi Yan | Match data | Jul 15, 2005* | R16 | Modena | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,620 | 34 | 58 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sanda Mamic | #1,100 | #83 | 437 | 1,586 | 14 | 23 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zi Yan | Sanda Mamic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Zi Yan | Sanda Mamic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2005 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2006 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24 | 37 | 61 | 39.3% | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Zi Yan's and 13/37 of Sanda Mamic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Zi Yan | Sanda Mamic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1/12 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 50.0% | 55.6% | 44.4% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 37.1% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4/16 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 51.5% | 63.4% | 43.4% | 65.2% | 45.4% | 53.4% | 41.4% |
| 21 | 2006 | 10/22 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 64.1% | 56.8% | 43.0% | 56.3% | 48.9% | 52.2% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 18/22 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 65.3% | 60.0% | 45.6% | 47.1% | 55.2% | 54.9% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 20/21 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 63.5% | 56.5% | 41.5% | 49.7% | 43.3% | 51.0% | 44.6% | 2008 | 8/9 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 58.1% | 57.0% | 41.2% | 41.4% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 43.5% |
| 24 | 2009 | 2/3 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 62.7% | 53.0% | 39.2% | 33.3% | 47.3% | 47.8% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 62.7% | 53.2% | 38.5% | 39.3% | 33.6% | 47.7% | 39.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 52/92 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 64.2% | 57.5% | 43.0% | 49.1% | 48.3% | 52.3% | 43.7% | — | 13/37 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 55.4% | 58.9% | 42.1% | 49.4% | 50.0% | 51.6% | 42.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Zi Yan | Sanda Mamic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2002 | 1486 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 1486 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.09 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1451 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.82 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–0 | — | -0.09 | 2004 | 1557 | 120.7 | -0.65 | -0.79 | 0.742 | 44.7% | +18 | -20 | — | 51.9% | +0.30 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.34 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1573 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -61 | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.7 | +0.28 | 2005 | 1518 | 109.1 | -0.82 | -1.26 | 0.888 | 48.0% | -19 | +52 | — | 37.8% | -0.65 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | -0.17 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1485 | 107.1 | -2.70 | -1.75 | 0.860 | 47.0% | -6 | +46 | +98 | 32.0% | -1.34 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.8 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 1543 | 115.3 | -0.92 | 0.00 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +13 | -15 | — | 37.8% | -0.64 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–0 | — | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 1528 | 117.9 | -2.92 | -0.04 | 0.910 | 47.8% | +36 | -10 | — | 31.9% | -1.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–0 | — | -0.15 | 2008 | 1510 | 106.7 | -2.80 | -0.04 | 0.885 | 47.4% | -4 | +31 | — | 38.1% | -1.29 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -0.17 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1486 | 98.3 | -0.13 | -1.41 | 0.855 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 1495 | 98.7 | -4.24 | -2.37 | 0.747 | 44.1% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.80 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1621 | 114.0 | -2.13 | -0.50 | 0.916 | 48.1% | +15 | -3 | +98 | 36.5% | -0.88 | 13–16 (45%) | 10–5 (67%) | 102.5 | +1.60 | — | 1587 | 114.4 | -2.03 | -0.47 | 0.875 | 47.4% | +1 | +29 | — | 42.4% | -0.51 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.2 | 0.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sanda Mamic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 18, 2008 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 26, 2005 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 12, 2005 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Katarina Srebotnik | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 24, 2008 | H2H |