H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Zuzana Ondraskova vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Zuzana Ondraskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2005 Forest Hills quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2005* | Forest Hills | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Iveta Benesova | 6-1 6-4 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zuzana Ondraskova | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |