H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Adrian Mannarino vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2016 Tiriac Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Mannarino
France Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #125 3-6 6-4 6-4 Adrian Mannarino #75 Match data Apr 21, 2016* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adrian Mannarino #67 #17 1,975 1,962 320 377 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Mannarino Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2008 3–3 50.0% #134 1,559 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2009 0–4 0.0% #179 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #83 1,681 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2011 17–23 42.5% #87 1,714 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2012 1–7 12.5% #192 1,597 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #59 1,702 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2014 16–23 41.0% #44 1,753 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2015 28–30 48.3% #47 1,786 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2016 26–28 48.1% #60 1,765 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2017 33–27 55.0% #28 1,944 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2018 25–29 46.3% #42 1,791 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2019 27–26 50.9% #43 1,841 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2020 14–17 45.2% #35 1,823 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2021 13–25 34.2% #71 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 26–26 50.0% #46 1,747 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 39–23 62.9% #22 1,907 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2024 14–28 33.3% #66 1,686 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–15 46.4% #69 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2026 13–24 35.1% #67 1,668 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adrian Mannarino Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2008 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2015 21 20 41 51.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2016 14 18 32 43.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2017 23 18 41 56.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2018 15 18 33 45.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 19 19 38 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2020 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2021 9 14 23 39.1% 0 7 7 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 21 19 40 52.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 26 15 41 63.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 13 19 32 40.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 9 12 21 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 8 13 21 38.1% 0 7 7 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 252 477 47.2% 17 68 85 20.0% 78 57 135 57.8% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 694/698 of Adrian Mannarino's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Adrian Mannarino Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2008 6/6 3.7 2.3 59.6% 68.7% 50.5% 49.0% 52.4% 61.1% 34.7% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2009 4/4 5.5 4.0 52.6% 61.7% 38.2% 54.3% 15.6% 50.3% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 6/6 6.7 2.8 60.4% 64.8% 47.8% 46.3% 31.7% 58.0% 32.6% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2011 40/40 3.3 2.6 59.3% 67.4% 49.5% 54.5% 41.6% 60.1% 35.2% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2012 8/8 3.6 2.6 57.9% 66.3% 42.2% 43.3% 37.3% 56.1% 30.4% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2013 25/25 5.6 2.5 60.9% 71.3% 48.6% 67.5% 45.4% 63.0% 32.6% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2014 39/39 4.9 2.6 63.0% 67.9% 51.6% 53.6% 48.0% 61.9% 37.5% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2015 57/58 4.4 2.5 61.1% 71.0% 53.0% 59.5% 41.8% 63.9% 37.3% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2016 54/54 4.9 3.1 59.9% 70.8% 48.4% 55.1% 43.8% 62.1% 37.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2017 60/60 4.1 2.4 59.9% 68.1% 52.1% 55.0% 48.5% 61.5% 38.3% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2018 54/54 4.7 2.7 63.4% 69.9% 50.3% 57.5% 50.7% 62.7% 35.2% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2019 53/53 5.3 2.2 59.8% 71.4% 53.3% 53.6% 46.0% 63.9% 37.9% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2020 31/31 5.1 2.9 58.1% 71.0% 51.8% 60.5% 45.5% 62.8% 38.5% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2021 38/38 3.9 2.7 57.7% 69.4% 48.8% 55.0% 32.9% 60.6% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 52/52 5.4 2.2 60.8% 71.0% 55.2% 52.0% 38.7% 64.7% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 62/62 4.9 2.3 60.5% 71.2% 52.8% 55.8% 50.5% 63.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 41/42 4.7 2.5 58.5% 67.1% 50.3% 54.7% 36.2% 60.2% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 27/28 5.5 2.0 58.3% 73.1% 53.3% 62.4% 43.6% 64.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 37/38 4.2 2.2 62.1% 68.1% 47.5% 54.4% 40.7% 60.8% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 694/698 4.7 2.5 60.3% 69.8% 51.1% 55.9% 43.7% 62.3% 36.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adrian Mannarino Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2007 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2008 1560 121.8 -1.26 -0.70 0.890 48.0% +55 — — 46.2% -0.69 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2009 1550 106.4 -2.79 -0.59 0.593 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.64 — 0–1 — -0.18 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1681 119.2 -2.84 -2.03 0.777 45.3% +10 — — 33.3% -1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.34 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2011 1715 137.3 -1.91 -1.36 0.882 48.0% -6 -171 +13 42.9% -0.82 5–8 (38%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.03 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2012 1598 117.8 -3.34 -2.70 0.691 43.6% +45 — — 17.6% -2.18 — 0–1 — -0.01 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2013 1703 136.2 -1.12 -1.60 0.881 47.8% -13 — +68 42.4% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.61 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2014 1753 138.1 -2.02 +0.94 0.985 49.8% -14 -256 +21 46.7% -0.06 4–10 (29%) 3–10 (23%) — +0.46 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2015 1787 145.8 -0.61 +1.36 1.033 50.4% +7 -263 +26 50.7% +0.04 8–12 (40%) 12–15 (44%) — +3.35 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2016 1766 149.1 -1.74 +1.15 0.978 49.6% -7 -167 +130 46.3% -0.11 12–8 (60%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.58 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2017 1944 153.9 -1.59 +2.46 0.996 50.0% -60 -254 -2 51.0% +0.27 14–7 (67%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.98 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2018 1792 142.1 -0.96 -0.32 0.944 49.1% -35 -157 +181 47.4% -0.48 7–11 (39%) 15–6 (71%) — +1.61 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2019 1841 147.0 -0.10 +1.98 1.049 50.9% -34 -197 +106 48.0% +0.16 9–6 (60%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.29 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2020 1823 153.2 +0.01 +1.72 1.036 50.5% +20 -215 — 47.6% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.04 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2021 1714 136.0 -1.86 -3.18 0.828 46.8% +64 -203 +218 37.2% -0.95 4–3 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.16 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1747 145.5 +0.78 +0.60 1.023 49.9% +30 -297 +126 48.9% -0.11 8–8 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1908 145.2 +0.08 +1.95 1.046 50.8% 0 -504 +70 57.2% +0.41 12–5 (71%) 15–16 (48%) — +2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1687 135.7 -3.17 -1.60 0.835 46.8% +55 -306 +131 36.3% -0.90 9–10 (47%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1751 137.3 +0.37 +0.87 1.020 50.2% -14 — +112 47.1% 0.00 1–3 (25%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1668 126.2 -2.78 -1.40 0.850 47.2% +33 -351 +148 34.8% -1.02 7–4 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1963 146.9 -1.12 +0.39 0.957 49.2% +1 -247 +95 45.8% -0.27 109–108 (50%) 133–164 (45%) 95.9 +1.01 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.